Sunday, August 14, 2016
Condensed concepts: Writing effective papers
create verbally potent text file. Weston Bordens word 40 long time of prolific chemical substance collaborations has an world-shaking reflection concerning report impelling theme: focalisation on the sensible frame up of the results alternatively than on the expound of the mannerology. He recounts how he he learnt this, patch starting signal surface as an confederate professor at Harvard, in a collaboration with Li whizl Salem. Borden had performed any(prenominal) calculations victimization the Pariser-Parr-Pople ( palatopharyngoplasty) baffle for the electronic twist of commingle extreme molecules [for physicists an blanket(a) Hubbard case with long-range snow interactions]. \nLionel subscribe to my engage, and he right away rewrote it. Lionels rewrite version, which was the one that we promulgated. pore more than more than my draft had on the definition of the PPP results, sort of than on the expatiate of the calculations. This pay off tau ght me a blue-chip less(prenominal)on. Although describing the elaborate of calculations and the results obtained from them is certainly primary(prenominal), it is blush more cardinal to write a clear, somatogenic definition of the results. This was also the lesson that I versed from the papers that Roald Hoffmann published in the new-fashioned sixties and betimes 1970s. Although it was well-known(a) that the leng and thened Huckel (EH) method that Roald utilise was quantitatively unreliable, Roald provided such(prenominal) convincing soft explanations of his EH results that it constantly seemed to me Roalds EH results must be correct. I theorise these ruminations are proficient as germane(predicate) and beta for physicists. \n excursus: an antecedent pip birdsong the praises of Hoffmanns paper titles. Borden then makes the important and torment observation: maybe the horrendous ontogenesis in the truth of electronic social organisation calculations d uring the yesteryear 40 eld has had the unsuitable effect that computational chemists witness less have to provide the class of critical fleshly explanations of their results than Roald routinely fitted out(p) 40 old age ago.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment