Sublime and Fantastic Elements in The Day We Were Dogs :: Day We Were Dogs Essays

Sublime and chimerical Elements in The Day We Were Dogs The Day We Were Dogs is a short fable scripted by an author born in Puebla, Mexico, in 1993. Elena Garros major themes revolve around the concepts of time and memory. I do not believe this reputation is a true example of magical realism however I do propose the sublime and the fantastic used in this narrative. I think that this story is really a misidentification of magical realism. To start pop out, I was moved by the federal agency the author talked round a daytime with two age inside of it. How could this occurrence be? It is two days and two realities. There also were two afternoons and two heavens, dog-irons talking, dogs named Buddha and Christ. I full see Garro trying to imitate magical realism, but she did a unwholesome job of it. I do select to give her credit for bring the sublime and the fantastic in, though. The char motioneristics of magical realism are phenomenal, deeper realm, visibility, mysteri ous, opinionated, timeless fluidity, and fascinating. This story has none of those characteristics, or at least it does not express them the way a magical realism story would. We recognize the world, although now-not only because we have emerged from a dream-we look on it with new eyes(Roh 17). I see what Roh is trying to say about magical realism, and I do not think one can use these certain strategies to figure out this story because it is fantastical and sublime. The fantastic is characterized by the marvelous, the uncanny, the natural, and the supernatural. The marvelous to me in this story would be the two parallel days. It seems so normal how Garro talks about it. They looked at one day or thing and saw what happened, and wherefore they looked at another. Being able to experience time this way seems so wild and crazy. Rabkin states that we recognize this reversal (90 to 180) through certain textual (signals)the reactions of the characters, the statements of the narrators, an d the implications of structures provided by implied authors.(Rabkin 11). The story does show a big reversal as the dogs act as dogs and the people act as dogs. Also, the character questions, Im a dog? Then another dog replies, Yes we are dogs. I saw that subsequent on in the story she realizes that she was a dog by replying ,Woof, Woof, Woof, when somebody asked her a question.