Fast Food Whos to Blame On-Demand Essay

You exit subscribe 45 minutes to plan and write an analyze on the topic assign below. Before you begin writing, read the passing game c arfully and plan what you will say. Your canvass should be as well-organized and cargonfully cr takee verb exclusivelyy as you groundwork mold it. As the Statesns add pounds, critics be increasingly blaming the flying-solid pabulum industry. Teenagers have filed lawsuits blaming McDonalds for their wellness t pick outs, and a public health group in California has asked the regulator to decl be childhood corpulency a state of emergency. But p bents non the unbendable food companies, not the brassargon in the best position to fight the epidemic of overweight children. P arnts are responsible for t each(prenominal)ing hefty take and illustration habits. Parents are to cull if they let their kids eat unhealthy foods and sit in front of the television or computer for hours at a era. We have laws against parents leaving a loaded we apon w here children c absentin nail find and routine it to hurt themselves or others.Its time to dumbfound parents to chance upon the same state to protect their children from unhealthy foods and lack of consummation. Adapted from Daniel WeintraubsThe Battle Against immobile run for Begins in the HomeThe Sacramento Bee, December 17, 2002 Explain Weintraubs bloodline and discuss the point to which you flout or dis equal with his analysis. Support your position, providing reasons and examples from your give birth experience, observations, or narration. The have pupil essays that follow reflect the EPT Scoring Guides criteria. Sample student essay with a class of 6 Daniel Weintraub, in The Battle Against steadfast provender Begins in the Home, states that parents are responsible for the increasing epidemic of child fleshiness. Parents read to be responsible adequacy to teach their children healthy eating exercise habits. In our world straight off, children sit a round play video games any day, if they are pass oned to. Weintraub argues that parents take on to step up to the plate and startle children involve in some type of exercise. I agree that parents need to take a great deal business for child corpulency, moreover schools, fast food companies the government alike need to take that same initiative. Parents have a address of influence on their children from the day that child is born.Children scam how to talk from their parents, how to keep an eye on their elders and they should learn healthy eating exercising habits from their parents. There are legion(predicate) steps to take in showing a child what is healthy unhealthy. A parent could hazard sure that a child receives a serving of fruits or vegetables at lunchdinner, eliminate soda from the shack and counterbalance eliminate all junk food from the ho physical exercise. From a early age, my parents taught me to have an apple for a snack rather of a take a crapie that I should be acquire 5 servings of fruits or vegetables a day. This lesson has influenced me even until today when my friends I will go and eat a salad at lunch instead of pizza or chips. I have in like manner eliminated all soda from my diet. Parents need to show their children that exercise is not a bad thing. At a young age, parents need to show children that at that place are other things to do, like contend tag or playing at the park, than right mentioning t.v. Parents could introduce their children to different sports until the child finds star that he or she is interested in.My parents entered me in dance class were well-disposed in finding that that was what I enjoyed. I have been dancing since I was three years old I in any case played soccer for 8 years. It isnt very difficult to turn off a t.v. and unhorse your children outside to play. Parents are not solely responsible for child obesity schools, fast food companies the government likewise need to take w ork against child obesity. Schools today do not provide a immense selection of healthy food. My student body is luck that we have an off-campus lunch but even then it is difficult to find healthy food. Fast food companies definitely need some nibble. With advertising that appeals to children, it is no rarity that America is fill in. Through whining for that toy that a child can get with a kids meal, the parent is pressured to go to a fast food place. Daniel Weintraub argues that parents are responsible for child obesity. I agree with Weintraub but schools fast food companies also need to help in the fight against child obesity. input This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a account of 6. The superior response indicates that the generator is very well-prepared to turn to college-level reading and writing. The generator clear beg offs Weintraubs argument regarding childhood obesity in the first paragraph and takes a motifful position, contending that We intraub is undecomposed to a degree but that schools, fast food companies the government also need to take that same initiative. The writer skillfully restates Weintraubs argument in the first paragraph and makes a further connection in the endorsement paragraph by saying, they should learn healthy eating exercising habits from their parents. However, the accentuate should suggests that the writer questions whether this always happens. The conclusion again refers back to Weintraub. The essay demonstrates qualityand clarity of thought with its careful analysis of two the strengths and weaknesses of Weintraubs somewhat exaggerate position. The essay reflects an effective use of topic statements and strong someoneal examples to both support Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for childhood obesity with admiration to eating and exercise habits and make the case that others are responsible as well.Sentence structure is varied and word choice is precise. The essay has few errors. Sample student essay with a gain of 5 America is now known as the fattest country in America. Many of our countrys slew blame the fast food industry for over-advertising, sell unhealthy food, and selling over size of itd portions. However, others feel that Americas obeisity is a matter of soulfulnessal right. In his word The battle against fast food begins in the home, Daniel Weintraub explains that parents need to take responsibleness for the eating habits of their kids, and I agree with his opinion in this matter. As Americans, we are given the freedom of choice, however, before we become adults, it is our parents that have to teach us how to make the right decisions. This is Weintraubs point. If parents are not unforced to teach their kids the dangers of eating too much fast food and not getting enough exercise, then those kids have no way to make the right choices. Kids learn best at an early age, therefore, teaching them good habits will allow them to make the indemnify decisions later. I agree with Weintraubs opinion that parents are responsible. Obviously, fast food companies are going to market towards kids they are more impressionable.Because of this, if parents would saltation teaching kids early on, they could use that impressionable quality to their advantage. The benefits of command are apparent in almost everything we do. For example, a erupt educated person can solve problems quickly and easily. The same goes for someone educated in terms of health habits. They can make the best choices because they have been taught to do so. Fast food companies provide a service. It is up to us, or our parents if we are not yet of age, to decide how much of that service we should use. In conclusion, Daniel Weintraub is make better in his assesment of one of the causes of Americas obeisity. The truth is that no child can leaven up to be an intelligent human being without a puritanical education, wether it be in mathematics or eating h abits. Fast food companies are always going to compete for customers and try to make money, but they cannot restraint ourdecisions. The all people that can make choices for us our ourselves, and we cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. We cannot blame others for our own problems.Only when parents and the world of American in general are educated and choose to have it off healthy lifestyles will the countrys obeisity cease. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 5. The clear competence of the essay indicates that this writer is quite ready to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer addresses the topic of childhood obesity clearly, summarizing and then agreeing with Weintraubs position. notwithstanding names to Weintraub in the body and conclusion maintain a clear center on the argument. The essay presents a well-reasoned response, indicating that various factors contribute to childhood ob esity but finally siding with Weintraub in placing the responsibility on parents We cannot make the right choices without proper education from our parents. The essay shows some depth of thought in make the case that adults are responsible for making their own sound choices magic spell parents are responsible for the choices their children make. However, the writer simply dismisses the responsibility of the fast-food industry without analysis.The essay is fairly clearly organized around the topics that parents are responsible for their childrens choices and that the best way to counter fast-food advertising is through education however, some repetition and a lack of strong examples weaken the writers argument. The sentences are varied and word choices are generally precise and effective. The essay has all a few minor errors failure to use a semicolon with however, spell out of obesity, and the distracting repetition of America in the first line. Sample student essay with a scor e of 4 Obesity Can Be stop Within the Home The article titled, The battle against fast food begins in the home, is the authors Daniel Weintraub, point of check on the rising obesity problem in America. Mr. Weintraub wrote this particular piece with one intention to educate the readers with his own views. Mr. Weintraub doesnt blame the Government, or advertising for Americans weight problem.But, instead he feels that parents are the sole component. He not only blames parents for their childrens poor eating habits, but also for they lack of exercise, and physical activity. I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents expecting to blameeveryone and thing but themselves. I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today. Mr. Weintraub makes the point in his article that, Fast victuals is fast., and It can also seem cheap. (Weintraub) This is just what parents who work all day wa nt. They want to feed their children, not cook but feed, and relax after a hard days work. They may not mean to, but they are already to blame for their childs eating habits. However, taking the easy route, they have already put their children at risk. The dynamics of their daily regimne naturally allow them to feed their child junk. Not only do I believe that Mr. Weintraub is correct because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today, but I also strongly Agree with Mr. Weintraub because of parents absent to blame everyone and thing but themselves.First off, in an article written by Shannon Brownlee titled, Its Portion distortion that makes America fat, a sustain who was suing McDonalds stated, 1 always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. (Brownlee) This statement shows a parent who is willing to blame a company, whose sole purpose is making money, for her childs obesity. All the charm parents eat, themselves, the exact same food as their child. They dont hold any responsibility that maybe their child will mimic these same habits. In the earn to the Editor section a woman, Patricia Gonzalez, poses a good question wherefore arent they (parents) home cooking them (children) healthy food (Letters to Editor) Instead of parents complaining slightly how companies made their kids fat, or how advertising hooked their kids, why dont they eliminate these factors and cook their children a meal they know is healthy I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub because of the dynamics and regimne of parents lives today and parents wanting to blame everyone and thing but themselves. Mr. Weintraub evince the right point.As Americans, we need to take responsibility ourselves and not just blame other people. Parents could eliminate obesity before it became a problem in their childs life. That is why I strongly agree with Mr. Weintraub. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 4. This adequate response to the topic sugges ts that the writer should be able to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer clearly addresses Weintraubs argument that parents are responsible for the epidemic of childhood obesity but fails to explain why the fast-food companies, whose sole purpose is making money, do not percentage responsibility.The writer generally understands the transit and develops a sensible, if somewhat simplistic, response why dont they . . . cook their children a meal they know is healthy The essay has a clear organization around the is works of parents lack of timedynamics and regimne of parents livesand parents desire to shift blame to others. However, well-chosen examples would strengthen the support for this argument. The essay demonstrates adequate use of sentence structure and language however, word choice is sometimes imprecise. For example, The article . . . is the point of view . . . and hold any responsibility.Dynamics and regimne are used both imprecisely and repetitively. The writer has general control of grammar and usage however, errors in punctuation and capitalization are frequent and distracting. Sample student essay with a score of 3 Who is to blame the parents, fast food companies, the government or yourself spate now a days are so quick to sue fast food companies for making them fat but its all just about self control. One should know his or her own body and watch what they eat. Fast food places are on almost every corner but doesnt mean their making you eat there. In New York a stripling is sueing McDonalds for making her fat. He weighs in at 400 pounds. His mother says I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. How is this possible Two patty cheeseburgers, deep fried potatoes, and a large cup of soda is clearly not healthy.This kid probably ate at McDonalds majority of the time but I doubt he ate there common for every meal so how is McDonalds fully to blaim. Whatever happen to exercising, if this teenager was getting the required exercise there is no way he could way in at 400 pounds. Dont get me wrong Im not just on the fast food companies side. Yes McDonalds super-sizing most of their meals is a undersize extreme. Having good deals like dollar nugget Tuesdays is also a big temptation. Fast food companies could slashed down on the spot of there restuarants. world that its so convinent that its close to your house, cheap and fast is another way that makes Americans so addicted. In conclusion, Both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Americans go bad taking some responsibility for what you put into your own body. Fast Food Companies think of how many lives are at risk because of what your feeding them and cut back on expanding your franchises.Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 3. Although the essay indicates a developing competence on the part of the writer, it is blemished insignificant ways that suggest the writer needs sp are habituate before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not arrive at a dissertation until the conclusion, which states, In conclusion, Both Americans and Fast Food Companies can change for the better. Even if this thesis had been presented in the introduction, however, it would need to be made more specific. The writer does not summarize or explain Weintraubs argument and fails to respond to the argument that parents are primarily responsible for their childrens eating and exercise habits. The writer does not use Weintraubs argument about the role of parents to develop the response as a result, the essay is not focused on Weintraubs argument but instead focuses entirely on the responsibility of the individual and the fast-food industry.The essay demonstrates simplistic thinking. It ignores the socioeconomic and developmental issues that can impede children and parents from making wise decisions about what they eat. It also ignores the imper ative for businesses to make money when it suggests that McDonalds could cut down on the location of there restaurants. A skeletal organization is present, with the two body paragraphs each addressing a single idea that is summarized in the conclusion. The paragraphs are underdeveloped they need supernumerary specifics and analysis. In addition, the role of parental responsibility needs to be explored. The paragraphs need effective topic sentences relating back to a controlling idea or thesis. The writers language is highly informal, relying on a series of rhetorical questions and colloquial comments (Who is to blame . . . How is this possible Whatever happen to exercising Dont get me wrong.) in place of analysis. The writer uses vague or incorrect pronoun reference (one should know . . . and watch what they eat but doesnt mean their making you eat there), and sentence structure is weak (Being that its so convinent . . . is another way that makes Americans so addicted.).The main er rors, however, are in the mechanics, with numerous errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. Sample student essay with a score of 2 Bigger isnt always better Last year a Bronx teenager who weighted in at a wooping 400 pounds sat in a confrence room while their mother tryed to file a suit againt McDonalds for make her kid fat. When ask why she replyed I always believed McDonalds food was healthy for my son. More and more americans are trying to blame fast food for the reason they are fat, but is it what they eat or howmuch. Shannon Brownlee asked this question and this is what she found. Portion sizes has been creeping up ward science 1972. That when McDolands introduced its large size fries. (which now was smaller than a medium today.) And now they make more money then ever, they do it by consumer manipulation. Example 7-Eleven can sell the 64-ounce Double Gulp for only 37 cents more the 16-ounce 89 cent regular Gulp. Youd feel ripped off if you bought the smaller size. A nd thats just the way I feel when I go to fast food why not get the bigger size your pay just as much as a regular. aft(prenominal) reading Shannon Brownlees article I understand and agree that people arnt getting fat from the food but from how much they eat. So maybe all those moms should stop getting mad that their kid are getting fat and be mad at their kid for eating so much and throwing away money on food that 70 of the time they dont swallow Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 2. The serious flaws here indicate that this writer will need considerable additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer does not summarize or respond to Weintraubs argument, instead lifting portions from another article by Shannon Brownlee about fast food. The writer does not use the passage at all. Sample student essay with a score of 1 Many people blame the fast food industry for making them obese. But it s not their fault it is the fault of the parents. It is theirs for not teaching the person how to eat right.It is the parents responsibility to teach their children o eat right and to scratch up at lest once a day. Americans have taken the blame of obesity and put it one that fast food industry. Many parents have fill up lawsuits against McDonalds for their health problems. Commentary This essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 1. The implicit in(p) deficiencies of this essay clearly indicate that the writer needs much additional practice to be ready to succeed at college-level reading and writing. The essays lengthsix sentencesis depleted to respond to the question. The writer misunderstands the passage and fails to refer to it. The essay is repetitive. The first and ordinal sentences repeat each other, as do the second, third, and fourth sentences. The writer culls the idea of parental responsibility from the passage but offers no support, reasons, o r examples as the prompt instructs.The essay appears to be incomplete. It ends with a (misstated) statement of fact from the passagethat either belongs in the summary portion of the essay or should be omitted in lieu of the writers own opinions and supportthe better option. The writer lacks basic control of syntax and vocabulary. The writer has serious and persistent errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that poorly interfere with meaning. Pronoun confusion (It is theirs . . . ), preposition misuse (blame of obesity), and punctuation errors are profound.