How would allowing Capital Punishment cut down on crime in America Research Paper

How would allowing Capital Punishment cut down on crime in America - Research Paper ExampleIt is argued that children, however, should non be subject to the death penaltythe only exception. From a moral standpoint, it would be misguided to study the failings of a minor with those of an adult, for a greater possibility exists that a minors character deficiencies will be reformed, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in the opinion for the court.2 In that sense, recents should be sp atomic number 18d, but adults should non be. As a child psychologist, California State Senator Leland Yee, Ph.D., has firsthand experience with troubled children and understands that they have an extraordinary capacity for rehabilitation. The neuroscience is clear brain maturation continues well through adolescence and thus impulse control, planning and critical thinking skills are not yet fully developed until adulthood.3 Thus, a juvenile stands a greater chance of being offered parole or some other oppo rtunity that is an alternative to the standard in a corrections facility. perhaps the juvenile might be able to enter a program with job training and a sentence reduction in return for darling behavior. The main point here is that the juveniles actions can show growth and variety show if allowed date and space to flourishwhile an adult has lived much of his or her life already, having made various life choices along the way, many not so wonderful. Further, the death penalty is fitting punishment for an adult, but not for a child. As Mr. Yee pointed out, the youths brain is still in a developing stage at age 18 and below. Without positive interventions to airt the youths development, an absence common to so many of the youth who subsequently become involved in serious delinquent or criminal activity, these youth are inappropriately subjected to the ultimate sanction without adequate regard for these mitigating circumstances.4 Not given the appropriate chance to demonstrate his o r her capability to rise supra and beyond the limitations placed upon him or her due to the circumstances of a bad upbringing or abuse, a youth is faced with the serious task of having to change behavior or be disciplined for it. The death penalty, therefore, seems like a good answer to deter crime in America. In Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the U.S. controlling Court mandated that courts must examine mitigating circumstances when issuing the death penalty. However, most juvenile capital offenders are represented by appointed counsel without the time or resources to sufficiently investigate such mitigating factors as psychiatric history, abuse, or mental capacity.5 With so many youth having mitigating circumstances, the death penalty is not a viable option. Now, by law, it is definitely not an option to hand down a sentence of capital punishment to juvenile offenders. However, for mentally suitable adults, the death penalty is simply a permanent solution that yields results lower crim e rates. Now, while the death penalty for youth would definitely not solve underlying issues that youth may have, this neglects the fact that youth deserve a second chance to prove their worth. Capital punishment would be fundamentally flaw as a punishment for a juvenile offender as it would be a final judgment, and there would be no retracting the punishment one time it